
November 3, 2026
Directors: Who is actually checking your company’s registered office?
“Our registered office was unmanned” is not a good explanation for ignoring court proceedings. It may reveal a separate statutory breach.
In Angus Construction Developments Limited v Sarkar (Dev) Limited, the defender’s solicitor withdrew from acting. The defender then failed to appear at a peremptory diet, and the sheriff, in compliance with the rules of court, granted decree against it.
The company appealed to the Sheriff Appeal Court. A director explained that the court papers had been sent to the company’s registered office, but that the office was unmanned.
The appeal was refused.
That explanation is particularly significant because section 86 of the Companies Act 2006 requires a company’s registered office to be an “appropriate address”.
This means that, in the ordinary course of events:
Failure to comply, without reasonable excuse, is an offence committed by the company and every officer in default. In Scotland, the offence can result in a fine, with an additional daily default fine for a continuing contravention.
The practical lessons for directors are clear:
An unmanned registered office is not simply an administrative weakness. It can result in a decree being granted, enforcement action, judicial expenses, and potential criminal liability.
An empty office is not a litigation strategy.
| John Kydd Partner, Litigation | ||||
|
The information and opinions contained in this blog are for information only. They are not intended to constitute advice and should not be relied upon or considered as a replacement for advice. Before acting on anything contained in this blog, please seek a solicitor’s advice from Gilson Gray.

John is a Partner in our Dispute Resolution and Claims Team, he is recognised as a robust negotiator and litigator and well-respected for his ability to deal with complex matters expediently