
By David Winnie
September 15, 2026
Selling or buying a company can be both an exciting and daunting experience. However, it is important to ensure that the transaction is structured in a way that best suits your circumstances.
One of the most important things to establish is whether the transaction will proceed as a share sale or an asset sale. Both methods involve a transfer of ownership in some form, but the legal and commercial consequences are quite different. Understanding the distinction is important because the structure of the deal can affect tax, employees, liabilities, contracts and more.
This blog will help you understand the pros and cons of an asset versus a share sale.
A share sale involves the buyer purchasing the shares in the company itself. The company continues to own all of its assets, contracts and liabilities, but ownership of the company changes hands.
An asset sale, on the other hand, involves the buyer purchasing specific assets from the company. These can include physical assets such as equipment or stock, as well as intangible assets such as intellectual property or customer contracts. Importantly, the company itself is not acquired.
From a seller’s perspective, a share sale is often more attractive. This is because the seller is transferring ownership of the company itself and may be able to achieve a relatively clean exit, although this will typically remain subject to ongoing obligations such as warranties, indemnities and restrictive covenants.
A share sale can also be more tax-efficient. The seller receives the purchase price personally in exchange for their shares and will generally be subject to capital gains tax, potentially at a reduced rate where reliefs such as Business Asset Disposal Relief apply.
In contrast, if a company sells its assets, it will usually be subject to corporation tax on any gain realised. If the proceeds are then distributed to shareholders, for example by way of dividend, a further layer of tax may arise. This can result in a form of economic double taxation.
A share sale is also often simpler from an operational perspective. Contracts with customers, suppliers and employees will generally remain in place because the company continues as the same legal entity. This can reduce disruption to the business and make the transition smoother.
However, it is important to note that some agreements may contain change-of-control provisions, which may require consent or allow termination in the event of a share sale.
For buyers, however, a share sale can present greater risk. The buyer acquires the company as a whole, including all of its liabilities and potential issues. These may include unpaid taxes, employment claims, ongoing disputes, defective products, or historic compliance issues that may not immediately be apparent.
As a result, buyers will usually undertake extensive legal and financial due diligence before proceeding with a share purchase. Their professional advisers will investigate the company carefully to identify potential risks. The sale and purchase agreement will also include warranties and indemnities designed to allocate risk and provide protection if issues arise after completion.
An asset sale can therefore be more attractive to a buyer. It provides greater flexibility, allowing the buyer to select which assets they wish to acquire and, to some extent, which liabilities they are prepared to assume.
For example, the buyer may choose to acquire the trading name, equipment and customer relationships, while leaving behind debts or ongoing disputes. This can significantly reduce the buyer’s exposure to historic risks.
However, it is important to recognise that not all liabilities can be excluded. Certain obligations may transfer automatically by operation of law.
In particular, where a business is transferred as a going concern, employees assigned to that business will usually transfer to the buyer under the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations (TUPE), along with associated rights and liabilities.
Despite their advantages, asset sales can be more complex in practice. Each asset may need to be transferred individually, which can require separate documentation and third-party consents.
For example, landlord approval may be needed to assign a lease, assignment of customer contracts may require consent, and licences or permits may need to be reapplied for. This can increase both the time and cost involved in completing the transaction.
From a seller’s perspective, an asset sale may also be less attractive financially due to the potential for double taxation, and because the seller (through the company) may retain responsibility for liabilities that are not transferred.
Ultimately, the choice between a share sale and an asset sale will depend on a range of factors, including the nature of the business, the parties’ appetite for risk, tax considerations and their overall commercial objectives.
A buyer seeking to limit exposure to historic liabilities may favour an asset sale, whereas a seller seeking a cleaner exit and a simpler structure may prefer a share sale.
Whichever structure is adopted, careful legal drafting and thorough due diligence are essential. Buyers and sellers should seek advice from legal and tax advisers at an early stage to ensure the transaction is structured appropriately and risks are properly managed.
Gilson Gray has an experienced corporate team that can help advise if you are looking to sell or buy a company.
| Mjria Barton Trainee Solicitor, Corporate | ||||
|
| Calum Crighton Partner, Corporate | ||||
|
The information and opinions contained in this blog are for information only. They are not intended to constitute advice and should not be relied upon or considered as a replacement for advice. Before acting on any information contained in this blog, please seek solicitor’s advice from Gilson Gray.
